| The Free Site | vBuddy - make friends, share photos, blogs, have fun | Cheap Web Hosting - starting at $5 |
Gingrich is now scaling back the traditional campaign operation to
focus on low-cost social media and an effort to cajole GOP delegates
to back him over front-runner Mitt Romney.
The new strategy: win a brokered convention. Or as one campaign
official said: A "big choice convention."
"Newt 2012 is transitioning into an organization appropriate for
winning a big choice convention," Gingrich communication director
Joe DeSantis said in an email to Politico.
"This big choice convention phase will be focused on two
goals.
1. Affecting the national dialogue to show that Gingrich is
the most capable of defeating Obama, by leading on issues that put
the president on defense — like Newt's $2.50 Gas Plan; and
2. A parallel communications strategy directly to the
delegates."
The new strategy hinges on preventing Romney from winning the 1,144
delegates he needs for the nomination, Hammond said. Gingrich plans
to spend much less time in primary states and will instead
personally call delegates to try to persuade them to back him at
the Republican National Convention in August.
"We are not going to cede to Mitt Romney's strategy to take the
party down," Hammond said.
Ultimately, Gingrich would bring the
fight to the convention floor, Hammond said.
Gingrich planned to shift the campaign's focus to digital
outreach.
Newt Gingrich said he “would like to win as many delegates as
possible” as the Republican primary continues.
“I would like to win as many delegates as possible,” Gingrich said.
“I’m campaigning selectively in places where we believe we will
pick up delegates. And we’ll continue to pick up delegates.”
Gingrich called the race a “long process,” adding that it didn’t
hurt the Democrats in 2008 to have Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama
competing through June.
“I don’t worry about the calendar right now. I care about presenting
new ideas,” Gingrich said.
The rules governing delegates’ voting options vary by state, and so
far, Gingrich has won bound delegates in eight states: South
Carolina, Nevada, Alaska, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Mississippi,
and Alabama. In Nevada, Alaska, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and
Mississippi, delegates are bound unless released by their
candidate.
In South Carolina and Alabama, however, Gingrich’s delegates still
would be required to vote for him on the first ballot, even if he
dropped out. And in none of these states can Gingrich force his
delegates to vote for another candidate; he can only encourage them
to do so.
Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is drastically
reorganizing his money-and delegate-deprived campaign, scaling back
a traditional operation to focus on low-cost social media and an
effort to cajole delegates to back him over front-runner Willard Mitt
Romney.

Clearly, Gingrich adheres to the the Christian-Catholic premise of "Owe no one anything but no love one another" and so refuses to make campaign-expense debt a problem for him and the American taxpayer.
The rollback in the campaign came after Gingrich listed more than
$1.5 million in outstanding debt by the end of February, according
to Federal Election Commission filings, including legal fees and
advertising production costs. At the same time, he had about $1.5
million cash on hand.
Gingrich tried to position himself as an anti-establishment figure
in the race while playing up the 20 years he spent in the House,
including a stint as speaker. His campaign peaked just before
the Iowa caucuses kicked off the nominating process in January, but
devastating malicious and slanderous attacks from Romney and a
Romney-aligned super PAC have deprived Gingrich of some significant
victories so far.
The former House speaker has won two primaries, in South Carolina and
Georgia, and currently has more than 12 percent of delegates.
WHY the recent shrill, hostile, and hateful-diatribe demands for
Newton Leroy Gingrich to get out of the GOP presidential race?
Why not instead scurrilous blatterings for Ron Paul (who has far
fewer delegates, compared to Gingrich) to suspend his presidential
campaign, like Migraine Michele, Herman Cain (and - lamentably -
Rick Perry) have done?
Why not adamant and increasingly-belligerent retorts for Rick
Santorum to exit the race, and thus stop taking votes and delegates
away from Newt?
Moreover, why not ask Willard Mitt Romney to get out of the race?
By allowing Gingrich into the GOP lineup in the first place at the
beginning, it might have been the intention of some McCain/Palin-type
operatives within the GOP Republican National Committee to merely
throw out a token bone of big-tent lip-service patronization to
that minority of fervently-activist Republicans who were authentic
Christian-evangelical fundamentalists - deceptively attempting to
entice them to come on board only to eventually (by associative
importunity) conform and hop on the compromising-RINO
bandwagon to ultimately support Romney.
But, bonafide Christians rather have, in fact, taken Gingrich as a
seriously-capable viable candidate quite qualified to actually
become nominated to compete against Obama in the November 2012
General Election!
For now, it looks like a win-win situation developing for
racist-and-sexist universal-religion demoncrats and republicrats
of both Obomination and compromising RINOs caving in and
capitulating to the re-election intentions of Barack HUSSEIN
"Barry Soetoro" Obama & Associates.
Delegate-less good-guy Gingrich is being demonized and relegated to
purported-loser obscurity and oblivion by RINO pseudo-"conservatives"
and their subversively-compromising network mediamen and mediawomen,
while genuine-evangelical-Christian fundamentalists consequentially
continue promising to vote 3rd party instead of supporting and
finally voting for windsniffing, pro-choice-about-abortion-homicide,
homogays-inclusive Romney (no matter WHO he would choose for the VP
running mate)....which Romney has been somewhat apologetic for his
cultically-mormon Massachusetts Romneycare.
I guess that Obama and his gang will simply have to spend their
billion-dollar-or-whatever campaign warchest on more Tiger-Woods-type
weekly golf excursions and trips to fairyland-birthplace Hawaii,
unless they also want to use part of it to gamble, bargaining with
antisemitic iranian-official hotheads about getting oil in exchange
for nukes.
All this while Bernanke discredits and disdains the Gold Standard to
keep the Federal Reserve in control, with yo-yo-inflatable/deflatable
funny "money" - rather than allow the monetary system to get into
control of the general freely-capitalist population, which people
would quickly begin to want and utilize different-denomination-amount
at-least-gold-plated coins for most common commercial and banking
transactions, instead of being incited to, with feds-manipulated
fiat paper bills, borrow themselves into foreign-oil-dependent
high-priced-gasoline foreclosure and bankruptcy debt.
GENUINE and SAVVY orthodox-fundamentalist Christians and Jews insist
on Newton Leroy Gingrich for GOP presidential candidate instead of
being stuck and incumbered with Willard Romney - yet Willard Mitt
Romney is said to currently have far more pre-Convention delegates
(both "soft" and "hard").
We, who are authentically moral and rational, thus hope for a
brokered GOP 2012 Convention in Tampa, in which Santorum will give
his delegates to Gingrich, and Romney's delegates will change their
minds, turn against Mitt, and vote for Newt. Ron Paul would be wise
to advise his no-government-interference no-foreign-involvement
delegates to also turn to Gingrich.
Explore http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/candidates.phtml
The [purported] positives of the so-called "Patient Affordable Care
Act" (i.e. ObamaScare):
One Obominite propagandist stated: "Before reform, hundreds of
thousands of families each year would find themselves on the brink
of bankruptcy just because someone got sick. Pre-existing conditions
allowed insurance companies to deny coverage to children. A coverage
gap for prescription drugs caught seniors by surprise, costing them
hundreds of dollars out of pocket."
But, in fact, in 2006 (during the Pelosi-as-House-Speaker reign)
and then after the Election of 2008, anti-George-Bush subversives
got the upper hand and elected Obama to tyrannically and
"fundamentally change America" into a bureaucratic socialist
dictatorship. So on March 23rd 2010, secretive /Obama/Pelosi/Reid
closed-door manipulators made history by imposing the [so-called]
Affordable Care Act."
Now, two years later, folks are starting to see the real-life impact
of "reform."
According to Obominite hype: "In Minnesota alone, 2 million people
no longer have a lifetime limit on coverage; 392,000 women have seen
their coverage for preventive services like mammograms expanded;
307,000 [perhaps only 306,998?] seniors and people with disabilities
who have Medicare have already received free preventive care; and
32,000 [or instead was it 31,996?] young people who would otherwise
be uninsured are staying on their parents' insurance plans until
they turn 26."
But, in fact, Secretary of Energy Chu, the Secretary of the
Interior, and the EPA Direction have done practically NOTHING to get
the mass-production of TRULY-affordable all-electric vehicles going
BEFORE and instead of raising gasoline prices by forbidding new
drilling for oil in our own country, and selling what oil we do
drill to hate-American foreign nationals.
Nor has the Secretary of Transportation made our highway system and
speed limits compatible for slower-moving all-electric
vehicles.
The verifiable negatives of the [alleged] "Patient Affordable Care
Act" (i.e. ObamaScare):
1. The CBO, within the past few days, estimated that instead
of ObamaScare costing $900M over a decade, it will instead cost
$1.7T.
2. The forced-insurance-purchase Individual Mandate will
cause the already-impoverish into foreclosure and bankruptcy.
3. It is non-constitutional for the federal or state
governments to force any American to buy any commercial product or
service.
4. ObamaScare will be administered by a panel of a few
non-congressionally-appointed Rationing Czars who will, in effect,
choose to cut the benefits of, plus lethally deprive, treatment
against (not "for") those politically opposed to Obama and his
regime.
5. Most Americans neither want nor need senseless and abusive
mammograms, nor most other "medical" "preventative" "care."
6. Most young people under 26 do not need to stay under their
parent's medical policies, nor any health-insurance policy at
all.
7. Forcing health insurance companies to take on everyone with
pre-existing conditions, especially those they themselves are at
fault for, will cause such companies to go belly up. It is like
forcing casinos to give out jackpot winnings to everyone who pulls
the handles on in-house slot machines. What kind of gambling is
that?
8. Most seniors are needlessly dependent on too many
pharmaceuticals as it is - which drugs cause both obvious and
short-term and hidden long-term harmful effects - whereas they would
survive much better with faith and trust and morality in Jesus as
God and Lord, drinking healthy juices, eating a well-balanced menu
of foods, plus resting and moderately exercising enough.
9. Any emergency hospitalization can be covered by adequately
adjusting already-existing Medicare, and bankruptcy recourse should
be allowed for those who require emergency treatment through no
obvious fault of their own.
Did not Mitt Romney learn anything as a quasi-deacon in the
moralistic Mormon church he grew up in and is affiliated with? So
why did he so change his position from adamantly being
abortion-choice . . . to [supposedly and probably-deceitfully]
becoming "pro-life?" - on something as theologically and Biblically
basic as whether or not to murder non-born human womb-babes by
committing and not performing abortion-homicide? Why was he even
abortion-choice to begin with at all?
It's as if true-Jew Saint Paul, and formerly one duce of a
devoutly-dogmatic Jewish-Pharisee Saul, had said, "I never was for
G-d but instead was always against Him from the beginning, because
I always hated His guts and cursed Him as much as I could whenever
I could. But, later on, I saw the light, and changed my mind, so now
I do not curse Him as much anymore."
The GOP's RNC, and state affiliates thereof, supporting Romney
instead of Gingrich, along with "jewish" and non-Jewish
network-media subversives disparaging, discounting, and discrediting
Newt Gingrich, reminds me of the nazis in the movie Raiders of the
Lost Ark digging in the wrong place nearby where the Ark of the
Covenant had been buried.
Yours truly would strongly recommend that no one give any money to
the GOP RNC or State affiliates thereof unless they are absolutely
certain that that monetary contribution will assuredly go to
nominate Newt Gingrich as the GOP presidential-candidate nominee.
Why allow it to deceitfully instead be diverted to nominate Mitt
Romney, and thus "throw your pearls before swine," and "give dogs
what is holy?"
The incessant and harshly-dogmatic, satanic mantras of
pro-Romney-pontificating cowardly-"conservative," RINO-consortive,
radio-network-talkshow wrongheads, along with
bassackward-immentality Romney-endorsing GOP governors and senators
(in close cohoots with republicrats who sadistically desire to
bankrupt the Social-Security-dependent poor by Flat-Tax mandate and
thus force them to lose IRS low-income cutoff and Standard
Deductions so as to start paying IRS taxes) . . . belligerently
blattering out that:
"all republicans will support whoever the only-for-the-rich,
waffling and windsniffing, homogay-inclusive,
Massachusetts-insurance-mandate, actually pro-abortion-choice, GOP
presidential candidate is"
or:
"all republicans (and enough Obama-loyalist-democrats and
mistrusting-GOP-candidates independents) will eventually all rally
around Romney" . . .
. . . are deceptively fraudulent presumptions of
irresponsibly-absurd defeatist propaganda.
This webpage author is a bonafide 'born-again' Christian
evangelical, who would [of course] indeed vote for
solid-on-sexual-social-issues Newt Gingrich, but will definitely
vote 3rd party (probably aligning with the Constitution Party if
Mitt Romney becomes the GOP presidential candidate in 2012 (no
matter who Romney chooses for VP running mate).
Limbaugh-supportive and yet-loyal new and older advertisers - plus
who for and what those Rush-supportive advertisers advertise
regarding company products and services - deserve your meager and
limited purchase money, and will obviously make best moral use of it
for the sake of quite-qualified-to-become-President Newt
Gingrich.
Boycott the sponsors who dropped and will not reinstate advertising
for Limbaugh, who would take your purchase funds and give them to
manipulative Obama/Romney media conspirators and diabolical
election-shenanigans devil-Obama subversives.
While perusing the Tube, and encountering Obama, it behooves the
sane and rational to mute the sound with the remote control button
to silently watch the half-negroid, born-in-Kenyan/lying-about-Hawaii
deceiver, who - with insidious cunning craftiness and weaselword
satanspeak - impudently rants on while taking
House-Republicans-based credit for what he and his demoncrats have
no right to steal credit from, promising betterment as things
actually get worse, brown-nosing confusion-and-consternation-causing
sexist feminists, cowering to arrogantly-incindiary homogay
perverts, patronizing Israeli Jews for politically self-aggrandizing
purposes, threatening sexual purists, fanning the flames of
retaliatory fundamentalist-orthodox catholi-protestants as gasoline
prices disasterously inflate relating to the wildly-fluctuating
yoyo-like Stock Market.
WILL lying-[Mombasa-Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born] Barack Obama brag
about all he himself (allegedly) along with his democrat cohorts
(like filthy-mouthed guttermind and bonafide-bunghole Bill Maher and
even goof Jon Stewart) have done to keep America going during the
past year? Will he take credit for what he alone and his activist
supporters have supposedly done to [allegedly] keep all Christians
and Jews from not going bankrupt, loosing their residences and jobs,
and dying off?
Will the socialistic Chicago Agitator and ACORN ballot-box-stuffer
take credit for dependable sunlight and gravity, lack of planetary
destruction by asteroid, absence of volcanic eruption, and no
devastating earthquakes in major cities?
For what - in fact - House Republicans have done to constrain him
and his demonutzos, which GOP has facilitated continuously-smooth
law-and-order operation of the country?
Will Barack "Barry Soetoro" Hussein Obama remind us of how
Pelosi's/Reid's Obamascare will force the impoverished to purchase
health insurance under his Individual Mandate, and tyrannize doomed
health-insurance companies to insure everyone with preexisting
conditions (which many of such irresponsible crippled were to blame
for handicapping themselves?
Has Obama opened up America's fossil-fuel resources and brought the
price of gasoline down to $1.99 a gallon like it was before . . . or
will he continue to capitulate to his waffling Energy Secretary Chu
(and others like him who probably want everyone to "save energy" by
repeatedly turning off the lights and then turning them on again to
burn out light bulbs quicker and thus waste more money) and shelve
gasoline engines without first putting something adequate enough its
place (and we're not talking green companies making no profit with
wind generators that don't turn on when there is no wind, and
pathetically-weak photovoltaic cells which product little juice when
it is cloudy and none at night - all for the purpose of saving some
endangered locust or earthworm per the insane hallucinations of
nutcase environmentalists?
Has he enraged Al Qaeda operatives by conspiring to murder Osama
bin Laden without trial - unlike what George W. Bush did against
Saddam Hussein?
Has Obama snubbed Netanyahu and both deceitfully patronized yet
inhibitorily worked against both Israeli security and settlements
by imposing pass-the-buck war-mongering . . . dangerously disrupting
the status quo in Egypt and Libya?
Has Obama put two inferior-gender, pro-abortion-choice, life-term
feminists on the High Court, and lauded Planned-Parenthood
abortionists - thus co-conspiring to murder scads of non-born womb
babes . . . far worse than Rush inferring that
contraceptives-for-fornication-insinuati ng
females-sterilization-accommodating anti-women's-health Sandra Fluke
was (by probable sordidly-lewd and lascivious intention) what he
rightly inferred?
Is his intent with discontinuing 'Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell' to promote
homoperversity - thus weakening our our Obama-defunded military. . . .
or instead to expose them as the pink-triangle-reminiscent,
concentration-camp-deserving, disgusting sinners and
anti-heterosexual harassers they actually are?
Being that Americans already have "socialized medicine" and
"government-run healthcare" with Medicare (which should begin at age
60 and not age 65, concordant with . . .
Leviticus 27:7 And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then
your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female
ten shekels.
Second Chronicles 11:21 [NON-porn, NON-prostitute?] Rehoboam loved
Maacah the daughter of Absalom above all his wives and concubines
(he took eighteen wives and sixty concubines, and had twenty-eight
sons and sixty daughters).
First Timothy 5:9 Let a widow be enrolled if she is not less than
sixty years of age, having been the wife of one husband. . .
. . . so-called Obamacare (or, better put: Forced-Individual-Mandate
ObamaScare) should be replaced with what Al suggested:
Cradle-to-Grave Medicare.
To force individuals to buy any commercial good or service (such as
a food item or vehicle) with non-free-market rationing regulations
(as ObamaScare does, with IRS tax penalty for those who fill out
Form 1040) is obviously non-constitutional.
Should Romney and even Santorum drop OUT of the GOP
presidential-candidate race - for the sake of Newt Gingrich?
Should Romney and even Santorum stay IN the GOP
presidential-candidate race - for the sake of Newt Gingrich - up to
a brokered 2012 GOP National Convention in Tampa?
IF Mitt Romney and even interruptively-rude rookie-hotshot Rick
Santorum suspended their presidential-candidate campaigns now, would
not all of Obama's mega-funded vitriolic and venomous anti-Gingrich
network media overwhelmingly attack and wear out Gingrich
alone?
It is clear that Romney is a verified handsome but
cultically-mormonic, deceptive and Mandate-imposing, RINO-endorsed,
windsniffing-waffler, blatantly-then-undercover-pro-choice loser (as
seen in http://videoclips12.tripod.com) . . . assuredly not able
himself to take on Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Obama
(exposed in http://lyingaround.tripod.com) . . . in victorious
debate, nor get the support of somewhat-disillusioned Obamanites nor
disappointed Independents nor even moderates, and especially not
genuinely-Christian-and-fervently-activist moral-social-issues
Republicans (who would rather vote Constitution Party and let the
chips fall where they would if Romney got to be the GOP
nominee).
But, as the open-minded, non-prejudiced, and carefully-attentive
reader can detect by the following hotlinked videoclip, Rick
Santorum is another one who (like Obama and Romney) has explicitly
stated that the Scriptural dogma and doctrines of the Catholic
Church will in no way influence his public-policy decisions as a
potential president . . . thus exposing Santorum as an inept,
snobbishly-arrogant, impulsive-comments novice who has NOT the
crucial experience, social-issues track-and-voting record, nor
professionalism which - in stark contrast - Mr. Gingrich certainly
has.
As one can obviously hear in the videoclip, Santorum accuses Iranian
leadership of "discriminating against women and gays."
And "gays?"
Should not homogays indeed be non-inclusively discriminated
against - no matter what type of government?
The facist-nazi Adolf Hitler ordered that pink triangles (his
version of eliminating 'Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell') be put on homosexuals
during the 30s or 40s and confined in concentration camps, plus sent
his Gestapo to suddenly execute homo-bullyboy brownshirt nazi thugs
who got Hitler into power (which noble anti-homosexual purge the
Biblically-based German Christian church of course did not object
to).
WHY does Santorum condemn Iranian leadership about women being
"abused" and "oppressed?" Does not pseudo-"catholic" Santorum
believe that nuns should have the holy habit of being dressed
modestly in the equivalent of burkas and hijabs?
IF Iranian (and other Middle-Eastern islamic-fundamentalist) women
truly thought that they were being "abused" and "oppressed" by
voluntarily choosing to accomodate to the Koranic-interpretation
general-consensus dresscode of being dressed very modestly in public
view on warm days, WHY do such women (emigrating into the United
States, and coming under the power and authority of non-sharia
American law-enforcement) still choose to be dressed modestly in
burkas and hijabs when in general public view on warm days?
Do they not see what their hedonist porn-in-motion bikini-clad
harlot-sight neighbors are mis-wearing as they shamelessly and
defiantly flaunt loose long hair, naked arms bared with
sleeveslessness, nude legs bared with shortened skirts and shorts,
and soxless feet in flipflop sandals?
Hey, like all other women in America, each fundamentalist-islamic
woman has a brain of her own to be aware of what is going around her
and what her potentially-licentuous options are, a mouth of her own
to call 911 if harassed or molested by extremist-to-them dictates or
dogma, and two feet of her own to escape to a police station - to be
dressed however she wants in accord with the liberty and freedom of
American fashions and styles.
Moreover, fundamentalist-muslim women are quite capable of depriving
fundamentalist-muslim men of sexual submissiveness if such women
thought that dresscode-concordant fundamentalist-islamic men
deserved such divorce-and-alienation-causing non-reproductive
frigidity. And who needs men when they could sodomize with
"liberated" american women as despicable and disgusting hell-bound
lesbians?
So why don't American muslims mis-dress like the other
lewd-exhibitionist pervertesses around them?
Why does Santorum castigate Iranian men and women for dressing
modestly, while pandering to "gays" to not discriminate against
them?
Who is the true "evangelical-Christian" "conservative?"
Is it not Newt?
The contest of GOP presidential candidates would be more
interesting, less confusing, and better for the country as a whole,
if (at the time of this writing) both non-commander-in-chief-type
mere-economics-professor Ron Paul and
yet-pro-choice/homogay-nondiscriminating tricky-semantics,
Dole/McCain-retread Mitt Romney and even
less-qualified/less-professional-than-Gi ngrich Rick Santorum
dropped out of the race and left Newt Gingrich to compete against
Barack Hussein Obama for the 2012 Election.
Romney-Endorser John McCain's videoclip about Non-Discrimination for
Homogays is found at the beginning of:
http://pseudomarriage.tripod.com/sodomarriage.htm
It is politically advantageous for Obominites to support Mitt
Romney as the GOP candidate for President in 2012, because they know
that IF Romney does become the GOP presidential nominee, Icorigin
(and his growing number of followers!) will vote 3rd party
[ relating to http://cdccmn2.tripod.com/atheism.htm ]
So, both Kenyan-and-not-Hawaiian-born Barack Hussein "Barry-Soetoro"
Obama and Mitt Romney are purported to allegedly be
"christians?"
Below are some Bible verses or Scripturally-based statements which
you will probably NEVER hear either one quote or agree with:
(1) Jesus, the Son of God, was never created. He always
existed back throughout eternity.
(2) Homogays and homosodomites will not inherit the kingdom
of God. [ Explore http://antihomogays.tripod.com ]
(3) Jesus is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. NO one
(including mormons and muslims) comes to the Father except through
Him.
(4) No true Christian allows any woman to teach or have
authority over men; they are to keep silent.
(5) Women will be saved through childbearing, instead of
committing (and not "performing") abortion-homicide or sterilizing
themselves into extinction using contraceptives.
(6) No harlot fornicator nor adulteress engaging in an
[immoral] "affair" will go to Heaven.
(7) Jesus Christ, the Son of God, created planet Earth and
everything in the entire Universe.
(8) The Holy Father, Jesus the Son of God, and the Holy
Spirit, are One Triune God.
(9) Those who do not believe that Jesus Christ's death on a
cross cancels the full penalty of all their sins will be forever
tormented with the flames of The Lake of Fire in Outer Darkness.
WHAT do credo-Catholic Newt and Callista believe?
[ Investigate political hotlinks at
http://videoclips12.tripod.com ]
Fascinating it is that the Mormon Church bypasses 'separation of "church" and state' by funding governmentally-enforced legislative and judicial efforts in California to prevent same-gender "marriages" - yet Romney (a cultic mormon who presumes that Jesus, the Son of God, was created by his Elohim father and Virgin-Mary mother, and whose brother is Lucifer/Satan) has declared in a videoclip at http://videoclips12.tripod.com that his mormonic church doctrine will not interfere in his 'separation-of-"church"-and-state' public policies for homogay inclusiveness and refusal to discriminate against homogays.
OVERHEARD?
Guy 1: Gonna vote for Romney?
Guy 2: Heck No! Why would a guy be adamantly pro-choice for
abortion-homicide in Massachusetts, and accommodate Planned
Parenthood in that state, but then now pretend to be pro-life - on
such a basic religiously-related issue - when he said that the
goody-goody moral stances of his quasi-cultic mormon "church" would
not affect his public-policy decisions as Prez?
Guy 1: So you support Obama?
Guy 2: I never said that, did I?
Guy 1: Well obviously, if you don't vote for Romney, you'll be
throwing away your vote to Obama.
Guy 2: No I won't. I won't vote for either one, so neither
gets my vote - for or against. I'll probably patriotically vote 3rd
Party, rather than merely abstain and not vote at all.
Guy 1: Don't you support any of the GOP presidential
candidates - imperfect as they are - like Ronald Reagan, who
divorced his first wife and brown-nosed the sexist feminists by
appointing Sandra Day O'Connor to the High Court?
After all, did not Newt put bathing-exhibitionist Bathsheba under
duress by ordering her up to his royal castle and getting her
pregnant without first marrying her, then set up her husband Uriah
to be murdered who then was indeed murdered, for which criminal act
he never ever repented?
Guy 2: Callista knows.
If the November 2012 Election choice came down to Obama vs.
Gingrich, who do you think so-called "moderate" [republican] RINOs
would vote for? You know in your heart that most of them would not
vote for Obama, but instead (albeit perhaps fearfully and
reluctantly) vote for Gingrich.
Guy 1: Got a point there.
And if genuine ultra-orthodox Christian Evangelicals and Jews (not
to mention fundamentalist Islamic) lose respect for Romney and
consider him a waffling and internally-dishonest wind-sniffer to
simply get votes, he probably would lose to charismatic Obama who
has cunningly convinced Americans that "things are gradually
improving but more time is needed for really-positive improvement" -
being that Romney would remind such confused voters of defeated
compromisers H.W. Bush (who lost to Clinton in '92 when Icorigin
voted for Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party, Bob Dole (who
also lost to Clinton in '96 when Icorigin again voted for Howard
Phillips of the Constitution Party, and McCain/Palin in 2008 (when
Icorigin voted for the Prez and VP candidates of the Constitution
Party once again).