Breaking News



Proverbs 19:22
What is desired in a man is loyalty,
and a poor man is better than a liar.



(revised 04 May 2012)

Gingrich is now scaling back the traditional campaign operation to focus on low-cost social media and an effort to cajole GOP delegates to back him over front-runner Mitt Romney.

The new strategy: win a brokered convention. Or as one campaign official said: A "big choice convention."

"Newt 2012 is transitioning into an organization appropriate for winning a big choice convention," Gingrich communication director Joe DeSantis said in an email to Politico.

"This big choice convention phase will be focused on two goals.

1. Affecting the national dialogue to show that Gingrich is the most capable of defeating Obama, by leading on issues that put the president on defense — like Newt's $2.50 Gas Plan; and
2. A parallel communications strategy directly to the delegates."

The new strategy hinges on preventing Romney from winning the 1,144 delegates he needs for the nomination, Hammond said. Gingrich plans to spend much less time in primary states and will instead personally call delegates to try to persuade them to back him at the Republican National Convention in August.

"We are not going to cede to Mitt Romney's strategy to take the party down," Hammond said.

Ultimately, Gingrich would bring the fight to the convention floor, Hammond said.

Gingrich planned to shift the campaign's focus to digital outreach.

Newt Gingrich said he “would like to win as many delegates as possible” as the Republican primary continues.

“I would like to win as many delegates as possible,” Gingrich said. “I’m campaigning selectively in places where we believe we will pick up delegates. And we’ll continue to pick up delegates.”

Gingrich called the race a “long process,” adding that it didn’t hurt the Democrats in 2008 to have Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama competing through June.

“I don’t worry about the calendar right now. I care about presenting new ideas,” Gingrich said.

The rules governing delegates’ voting options vary by state, and so far, Gingrich has won bound delegates in eight states: South Carolina, Nevada, Alaska, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Alabama. In Nevada, Alaska, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Mississippi, delegates are bound unless released by their candidate.

In South Carolina and Alabama, however, Gingrich’s delegates still would be required to vote for him on the first ballot, even if he dropped out. And in none of these states can Gingrich force his delegates to vote for another candidate; he can only encourage them to do so.

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is drastically reorganizing his money-and delegate-deprived campaign, scaling back a traditional operation to focus on low-cost social media and an effort to cajole delegates to back him over front-runner Willard Mitt Romney.

Clearly, Gingrich adheres to the the Christian-Catholic premise of "Owe no one anything but no love one another" and so refuses to make campaign-expense debt a problem for him and the American taxpayer.

The rollback in the campaign came after Gingrich listed more than $1.5 million in outstanding debt by the end of February, according to Federal Election Commission filings, including legal fees and advertising production costs. At the same time, he had about $1.5 million cash on hand.

Gingrich tried to position himself as an anti-establishment figure in the race while playing up the 20 years he spent in the House, including a stint as speaker. His campaign peaked just before the Iowa caucuses kicked off the nominating process in January, but devastating malicious and slanderous attacks from Romney and a Romney-aligned super PAC have deprived Gingrich of some significant victories so far.

The former House speaker has won two primaries, in South Carolina and Georgia, and currently has more than 12 percent of delegates.

WHY the recent shrill, hostile, and hateful-diatribe demands for Newton Leroy Gingrich to get out of the GOP presidential race?

Why not instead scurrilous blatterings for Ron Paul (who has far fewer delegates, compared to Gingrich) to suspend his presidential campaign, like Migraine Michele, Herman Cain (and - lamentably - Rick Perry) have done?

Why not adamant and increasingly-belligerent retorts for Rick Santorum to exit the race, and thus stop taking votes and delegates away from Newt?

Moreover, why not ask Willard Mitt Romney to get out of the race?

By allowing Gingrich into the GOP lineup in the first place at the beginning, it might have been the intention of some McCain/Palin-type operatives within the GOP Republican National Committee to merely throw out a token bone of big-tent lip-service patronization to that minority of fervently-activist Republicans who were authentic Christian-evangelical fundamentalists - deceptively attempting to entice them to come on board only to eventually (by associative importunity) conform and hop on the compromising-RINO bandwagon to ultimately support Romney.

But, bonafide Christians rather have, in fact, taken Gingrich as a seriously-capable viable candidate quite qualified to actually become nominated to compete against Obama in the November 2012 General Election!

For now, it looks like a win-win situation developing for racist-and-sexist universal-religion demoncrats and republicrats of both Obomination and compromising RINOs caving in and capitulating to the re-election intentions of Barack HUSSEIN "Barry Soetoro" Obama & Associates.

Delegate-less good-guy Gingrich is being demonized and relegated to purported-loser obscurity and oblivion by RINO pseudo-"conservatives" and their subversively-compromising network mediamen and mediawomen, while genuine-evangelical-Christian fundamentalists consequentially continue promising to vote 3rd party instead of supporting and finally voting for windsniffing, pro-choice-about-abortion-homicide, homogays-inclusive Romney (no matter WHO he would choose for the VP running mate)....which Romney has been somewhat apologetic for his cultically-mormon Massachusetts Romneycare.

I guess that Obama and his gang will simply have to spend their billion-dollar-or-whatever campaign warchest on more Tiger-Woods-type weekly golf excursions and trips to fairyland-birthplace Hawaii, unless they also want to use part of it to gamble, bargaining with antisemitic iranian-official hotheads about getting oil in exchange for nukes.

All this while Bernanke discredits and disdains the Gold Standard to keep the Federal Reserve in control, with yo-yo-inflatable/deflatable funny "money" - rather than allow the monetary system to get into control of the general freely-capitalist population, which people would quickly begin to want and utilize different-denomination-amount at-least-gold-plated coins for most common commercial and banking transactions, instead of being incited to, with feds-manipulated fiat paper bills, borrow themselves into foreign-oil-dependent high-priced-gasoline foreclosure and bankruptcy debt.

GENUINE and SAVVY orthodox-fundamentalist Christians and Jews insist on Newton Leroy Gingrich for GOP presidential candidate instead of being stuck and incumbered with Willard Romney - yet Willard Mitt Romney is said to currently have far more pre-Convention delegates (both "soft" and "hard").

We, who are authentically moral and rational, thus hope for a brokered GOP 2012 Convention in Tampa, in which Santorum will give his delegates to Gingrich, and Romney's delegates will change their minds, turn against Mitt, and vote for Newt. Ron Paul would be wise to advise his no-government-interference no-foreign-involvement delegates to also turn to Gingrich.

Explore http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/candidates.phtml

The [purported] positives of the so-called "Patient Affordable Care Act" (i.e. ObamaScare):

One Obominite propagandist stated: "Before reform, hundreds of thousands of families each year would find themselves on the brink of bankruptcy just because someone got sick. Pre-existing conditions allowed insurance companies to deny coverage to children. A coverage gap for prescription drugs caught seniors by surprise, costing them hundreds of dollars out of pocket."

But, in fact, in 2006 (during the Pelosi-as-House-Speaker reign) and then after the Election of 2008, anti-George-Bush subversives got the upper hand and elected Obama to tyrannically and "fundamentally change America" into a bureaucratic socialist dictatorship. So on March 23rd 2010, secretive /Obama/Pelosi/Reid closed-door manipulators made history by imposing the [so-called] Affordable Care Act."

Now, two years later, folks are starting to see the real-life impact of "reform."

According to Obominite hype: "In Minnesota alone, 2 million people no longer have a lifetime limit on coverage; 392,000 women have seen their coverage for preventive services like mammograms expanded; 307,000 [perhaps only 306,998?] seniors and people with disabilities who have Medicare have already received free preventive care; and 32,000 [or instead was it 31,996?] young people who would otherwise be uninsured are staying on their parents' insurance plans until they turn 26."

But, in fact, Secretary of Energy Chu, the Secretary of the Interior, and the EPA Direction have done practically NOTHING to get the mass-production of TRULY-affordable all-electric vehicles going BEFORE and instead of raising gasoline prices by forbidding new drilling for oil in our own country, and selling what oil we do drill to hate-American foreign nationals.

Nor has the Secretary of Transportation made our highway system and speed limits compatible for slower-moving all-electric vehicles.

The verifiable negatives of the [alleged] "Patient Affordable Care Act" (i.e. ObamaScare):

1. The CBO, within the past few days, estimated that instead of ObamaScare costing $900M over a decade, it will instead cost $1.7T.

2. The forced-insurance-purchase Individual Mandate will cause the already-impoverish into foreclosure and bankruptcy.

3. It is non-constitutional for the federal or state governments to force any American to buy any commercial product or service.

4. ObamaScare will be administered by a panel of a few non-congressionally-appointed Rationing Czars who will, in effect, choose to cut the benefits of, plus lethally deprive, treatment against (not "for") those politically opposed to Obama and his regime.

5. Most Americans neither want nor need senseless and abusive mammograms, nor most other "medical" "preventative" "care."

6. Most young people under 26 do not need to stay under their parent's medical policies, nor any health-insurance policy at all.

7. Forcing health insurance companies to take on everyone with pre-existing conditions, especially those they themselves are at fault for, will cause such companies to go belly up. It is like forcing casinos to give out jackpot winnings to everyone who pulls the handles on in-house slot machines. What kind of gambling is that?

8. Most seniors are needlessly dependent on too many pharmaceuticals as it is - which drugs cause both obvious and short-term and hidden long-term harmful effects - whereas they would survive much better with faith and trust and morality in Jesus as God and Lord, drinking healthy juices, eating a well-balanced menu of foods, plus resting and moderately exercising enough.

9. Any emergency hospitalization can be covered by adequately adjusting already-existing Medicare, and bankruptcy recourse should be allowed for those who require emergency treatment through no obvious fault of their own.

Did not Mitt Romney learn anything as a quasi-deacon in the moralistic Mormon church he grew up in and is affiliated with? So why did he so change his position from adamantly being abortion-choice . . . to [supposedly and probably-deceitfully] becoming "pro-life?" - on something as theologically and Biblically basic as whether or not to murder non-born human womb-babes by committing and not performing abortion-homicide? Why was he even abortion-choice to begin with at all?

It's as if true-Jew Saint Paul, and formerly one duce of a devoutly-dogmatic Jewish-Pharisee Saul, had said, "I never was for G-d but instead was always against Him from the beginning, because I always hated His guts and cursed Him as much as I could whenever I could. But, later on, I saw the light, and changed my mind, so now I do not curse Him as much anymore."

The GOP's RNC, and state affiliates thereof, supporting Romney instead of Gingrich, along with "jewish" and non-Jewish network-media subversives disparaging, discounting, and discrediting Newt Gingrich, reminds me of the nazis in the movie Raiders of the Lost Ark digging in the wrong place nearby where the Ark of the Covenant had been buried.

Yours truly would strongly recommend that no one give any money to the GOP RNC or State affiliates thereof unless they are absolutely certain that that monetary contribution will assuredly go to nominate Newt Gingrich as the GOP presidential-candidate nominee. Why allow it to deceitfully instead be diverted to nominate Mitt Romney, and thus "throw your pearls before swine," and "give dogs what is holy?"

The incessant and harshly-dogmatic, satanic mantras of pro-Romney-pontificating cowardly-"conservative," RINO-consortive, radio-network-talkshow wrongheads, along with bassackward-immentality Romney-endorsing GOP governors and senators (in close cohoots with republicrats who sadistically desire to bankrupt the Social-Security-dependent poor by Flat-Tax mandate and thus force them to lose IRS low-income cutoff and Standard Deductions so as to start paying IRS taxes) . . . belligerently blattering out that:

"all republicans will support whoever the only-for-the-rich, waffling and windsniffing, homogay-inclusive, Massachusetts-insurance-mandate, actually pro-abortion-choice, GOP presidential candidate is"

or:

"all republicans (and enough Obama-loyalist-democrats and mistrusting-GOP-candidates independents) will eventually all rally around Romney" . . .

. . . are deceptively fraudulent presumptions of irresponsibly-absurd defeatist propaganda.

This webpage author is a bonafide 'born-again' Christian evangelical, who would [of course] indeed vote for solid-on-sexual-social-issues Newt Gingrich, but will definitely vote 3rd party (probably aligning with the Constitution Party if Mitt Romney becomes the GOP presidential candidate in 2012 (no matter who Romney chooses for VP running mate).

Limbaugh-supportive and yet-loyal new and older advertisers - plus who for and what those Rush-supportive advertisers advertise regarding company products and services - deserve your meager and limited purchase money, and will obviously make best moral use of it for the sake of quite-qualified-to-become-President Newt Gingrich.

Boycott the sponsors who dropped and will not reinstate advertising for Limbaugh, who would take your purchase funds and give them to manipulative Obama/Romney media conspirators and diabolical election-shenanigans devil-Obama subversives.

While perusing the Tube, and encountering Obama, it behooves the sane and rational to mute the sound with the remote control button to silently watch the half-negroid, born-in-Kenyan/lying-about-Hawaii deceiver, who - with insidious cunning craftiness and weaselword satanspeak - impudently rants on while taking House-Republicans-based credit for what he and his demoncrats have no right to steal credit from, promising betterment as things actually get worse, brown-nosing confusion-and-consternation-causing sexist feminists, cowering to arrogantly-incindiary homogay perverts, patronizing Israeli Jews for politically self-aggrandizing purposes, threatening sexual purists, fanning the flames of retaliatory fundamentalist-orthodox catholi-protestants as gasoline prices disasterously inflate relating to the wildly-fluctuating yoyo-like Stock Market.

WILL lying-[Mombasa-Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born] Barack Obama brag about all he himself (allegedly) along with his democrat cohorts (like filthy-mouthed guttermind and bonafide-bunghole Bill Maher and even goof Jon Stewart) have done to keep America going during the past year? Will he take credit for what he alone and his activist supporters have supposedly done to [allegedly] keep all Christians and Jews from not going bankrupt, loosing their residences and jobs, and dying off?

Will the socialistic Chicago Agitator and ACORN ballot-box-stuffer take credit for dependable sunlight and gravity, lack of planetary destruction by asteroid, absence of volcanic eruption, and no devastating earthquakes in major cities?

For what - in fact - House Republicans have done to constrain him and his demonutzos, which GOP has facilitated continuously-smooth law-and-order operation of the country?

Will Barack "Barry Soetoro" Hussein Obama remind us of how Pelosi's/Reid's Obamascare will force the impoverished to purchase health insurance under his Individual Mandate, and tyrannize doomed health-insurance companies to insure everyone with preexisting conditions (which many of such irresponsible crippled were to blame for handicapping themselves?

Has Obama opened up America's fossil-fuel resources and brought the price of gasoline down to $1.99 a gallon like it was before . . . or will he continue to capitulate to his waffling Energy Secretary Chu (and others like him who probably want everyone to "save energy" by repeatedly turning off the lights and then turning them on again to burn out light bulbs quicker and thus waste more money) and shelve gasoline engines without first putting something adequate enough its place (and we're not talking green companies making no profit with wind generators that don't turn on when there is no wind, and pathetically-weak photovoltaic cells which product little juice when it is cloudy and none at night - all for the purpose of saving some endangered locust or earthworm per the insane hallucinations of nutcase environmentalists?

Has he enraged Al Qaeda operatives by conspiring to murder Osama bin Laden without trial - unlike what George W. Bush did against Saddam Hussein?

Has Obama snubbed Netanyahu and both deceitfully patronized yet inhibitorily worked against both Israeli security and settlements by imposing pass-the-buck war-mongering . . . dangerously disrupting the status quo in Egypt and Libya?

Has Obama put two inferior-gender, pro-abortion-choice, life-term feminists on the High Court, and lauded Planned-Parenthood abortionists - thus co-conspiring to murder scads of non-born womb babes . . . far worse than Rush inferring that contraceptives-for-fornication-insinuati ng females-sterilization-accommodating anti-women's-health Sandra Fluke was (by probable sordidly-lewd and lascivious intention) what he rightly inferred?

Is his intent with discontinuing 'Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell' to promote homoperversity - thus weakening our our Obama-defunded military. . . . or instead to expose them as the pink-triangle-reminiscent, concentration-camp-deserving, disgusting sinners and anti-heterosexual harassers they actually are?

Being that Americans already have "socialized medicine" and "government-run healthcare" with Medicare (which should begin at age 60 and not age 65, concordant with . . .

Leviticus 27:7 And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.

Second Chronicles 11:21 [NON-porn, NON-prostitute?] Rehoboam loved Maacah the daughter of Absalom above all his wives and concubines (he took eighteen wives and sixty concubines, and had twenty-eight sons and sixty daughters).

First Timothy 5:9 Let a widow be enrolled if she is not less than sixty years of age, having been the wife of one husband. . .

. . . so-called Obamacare (or, better put: Forced-Individual-Mandate ObamaScare) should be replaced with what Al suggested: Cradle-to-Grave Medicare.

To force individuals to buy any commercial good or service (such as a food item or vehicle) with non-free-market rationing regulations (as ObamaScare does, with IRS tax penalty for those who fill out Form 1040) is obviously non-constitutional.

Should Romney and even Santorum drop OUT of the GOP presidential-candidate race - for the sake of Newt Gingrich?

Should Romney and even Santorum stay IN the GOP presidential-candidate race - for the sake of Newt Gingrich - up to a brokered 2012 GOP National Convention in Tampa?

IF Mitt Romney and even interruptively-rude rookie-hotshot Rick Santorum suspended their presidential-candidate campaigns now, would not all of Obama's mega-funded vitriolic and venomous anti-Gingrich network media overwhelmingly attack and wear out Gingrich alone?

It is clear that Romney is a verified handsome but cultically-mormonic, deceptive and Mandate-imposing, RINO-endorsed, windsniffing-waffler, blatantly-then-undercover-pro-choice loser (as seen in http://videoclips12.tripod.com) . . . assuredly not able himself to take on Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Obama (exposed in http://lyingaround.tripod.com) . . . in victorious debate, nor get the support of somewhat-disillusioned Obamanites nor disappointed Independents nor even moderates, and especially not genuinely-Christian-and-fervently-activist moral-social-issues Republicans (who would rather vote Constitution Party and let the chips fall where they would if Romney got to be the GOP nominee).

But, as the open-minded, non-prejudiced, and carefully-attentive reader can detect by the following hotlinked videoclip, Rick Santorum is another one who (like Obama and Romney) has explicitly stated that the Scriptural dogma and doctrines of the Catholic Church will in no way influence his public-policy decisions as a potential president . . . thus exposing Santorum as an inept, snobbishly-arrogant, impulsive-comments novice who has NOT the crucial experience, social-issues track-and-voting record, nor professionalism which - in stark contrast - Mr. Gingrich certainly has.

As one can obviously hear in the videoclip, Santorum accuses Iranian leadership of "discriminating against women and gays."

And "gays?"

Should not homogays indeed be non-inclusively discriminated against - no matter what type of government?

The facist-nazi Adolf Hitler ordered that pink triangles (his version of eliminating 'Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell') be put on homosexuals during the 30s or 40s and confined in concentration camps, plus sent his Gestapo to suddenly execute homo-bullyboy brownshirt nazi thugs who got Hitler into power (which noble anti-homosexual purge the Biblically-based German Christian church of course did not object to).

WHY does Santorum condemn Iranian leadership about women being "abused" and "oppressed?" Does not pseudo-"catholic" Santorum believe that nuns should have the holy habit of being dressed modestly in the equivalent of burkas and hijabs?

IF Iranian (and other Middle-Eastern islamic-fundamentalist) women truly thought that they were being "abused" and "oppressed" by voluntarily choosing to accomodate to the Koranic-interpretation general-consensus dresscode of being dressed very modestly in public view on warm days, WHY do such women (emigrating into the United States, and coming under the power and authority of non-sharia American law-enforcement) still choose to be dressed modestly in burkas and hijabs when in general public view on warm days?

Do they not see what their hedonist porn-in-motion bikini-clad harlot-sight neighbors are mis-wearing as they shamelessly and defiantly flaunt loose long hair, naked arms bared with sleeveslessness, nude legs bared with shortened skirts and shorts, and soxless feet in flipflop sandals?

Hey, like all other women in America, each fundamentalist-islamic woman has a brain of her own to be aware of what is going around her and what her potentially-licentuous options are, a mouth of her own to call 911 if harassed or molested by extremist-to-them dictates or dogma, and two feet of her own to escape to a police station - to be dressed however she wants in accord with the liberty and freedom of American fashions and styles.

Moreover, fundamentalist-muslim women are quite capable of depriving fundamentalist-muslim men of sexual submissiveness if such women thought that dresscode-concordant fundamentalist-islamic men deserved such divorce-and-alienation-causing non-reproductive frigidity. And who needs men when they could sodomize with "liberated" american women as despicable and disgusting hell-bound lesbians?

So why don't American muslims mis-dress like the other lewd-exhibitionist pervertesses around them?

Why does Santorum castigate Iranian men and women for dressing modestly, while pandering to "gays" to not discriminate against them?

Who is the true "evangelical-Christian" "conservative?"

Is it not Newt?

The contest of GOP presidential candidates would be more interesting, less confusing, and better for the country as a whole, if (at the time of this writing) both non-commander-in-chief-type mere-economics-professor Ron Paul and yet-pro-choice/homogay-nondiscriminating tricky-semantics, Dole/McCain-retread Mitt Romney and even less-qualified/less-professional-than-Gi ngrich Rick Santorum dropped out of the race and left Newt Gingrich to compete against Barack Hussein Obama for the 2012 Election.

Romney-Endorser John McCain's videoclip about Non-Discrimination for Homogays is found at the beginning of:

http://pseudomarriage.tripod.com/sodomarriage.htm

It is politically advantageous for Obominites to support Mitt Romney as the GOP candidate for President in 2012, because they know that IF Romney does become the GOP presidential nominee, Icorigin (and his growing number of followers!) will vote 3rd party [ relating to http://cdccmn2.tripod.com/atheism.htm ]

So, both Kenyan-and-not-Hawaiian-born Barack Hussein "Barry-Soetoro" Obama and Mitt Romney are purported to allegedly be "christians?"

Below are some Bible verses or Scripturally-based statements which you will probably NEVER hear either one quote or agree with:

(1) Jesus, the Son of God, was never created. He always existed back throughout eternity.

(2) Homogays and homosodomites will not inherit the kingdom of God. [ Explore http://antihomogays.tripod.com ]

(3) Jesus is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. NO one (including mormons and muslims) comes to the Father except through Him.

(4) No true Christian allows any woman to teach or have authority over men; they are to keep silent.

(5) Women will be saved through childbearing, instead of committing (and not "performing") abortion-homicide or sterilizing themselves into extinction using contraceptives.

(6) No harlot fornicator nor adulteress engaging in an [immoral] "affair" will go to Heaven.

(7) Jesus Christ, the Son of God, created planet Earth and everything in the entire Universe.

(8) The Holy Father, Jesus the Son of God, and the Holy Spirit, are One Triune God.

(9) Those who do not believe that Jesus Christ's death on a cross cancels the full penalty of all their sins will be forever tormented with the flames of The Lake of Fire in Outer Darkness.

WHAT do credo-Catholic Newt and Callista believe?

[ Investigate political hotlinks at http://videoclips12.tripod.com ]

Fascinating it is that the Mormon Church bypasses 'separation of "church" and state' by funding governmentally-enforced legislative and judicial efforts in California to prevent same-gender "marriages" - yet Romney (a cultic mormon who presumes that Jesus, the Son of God, was created by his Elohim father and Virgin-Mary mother, and whose brother is Lucifer/Satan) has declared in a videoclip at http://videoclips12.tripod.com that his mormonic church doctrine will not interfere in his 'separation-of-"church"-and-state' public policies for homogay inclusiveness and refusal to discriminate against homogays.

OVERHEARD?

Guy 1: Gonna vote for Romney?

Guy 2: Heck No! Why would a guy be adamantly pro-choice for abortion-homicide in Massachusetts, and accommodate Planned Parenthood in that state, but then now pretend to be pro-life - on such a basic religiously-related issue - when he said that the goody-goody moral stances of his quasi-cultic mormon "church" would not affect his public-policy decisions as Prez?

Guy 1: So you support Obama?

Guy 2: I never said that, did I?

Guy 1: Well obviously, if you don't vote for Romney, you'll be throwing away your vote to Obama.

Guy 2: No I won't. I won't vote for either one, so neither gets my vote - for or against. I'll probably patriotically vote 3rd Party, rather than merely abstain and not vote at all.

Guy 1: Don't you support any of the GOP presidential candidates - imperfect as they are - like Ronald Reagan, who divorced his first wife and brown-nosed the sexist feminists by appointing Sandra Day O'Connor to the High Court?

After all, did not Newt put bathing-exhibitionist Bathsheba under duress by ordering her up to his royal castle and getting her pregnant without first marrying her, then set up her husband Uriah to be murdered who then was indeed murdered, for which criminal act he never ever repented?

Guy 2: Callista knows.

If the November 2012 Election choice came down to Obama vs. Gingrich, who do you think so-called "moderate" [republican] RINOs would vote for? You know in your heart that most of them would not vote for Obama, but instead (albeit perhaps fearfully and reluctantly) vote for Gingrich.

Guy 1: Got a point there.

And if genuine ultra-orthodox Christian Evangelicals and Jews (not to mention fundamentalist Islamic) lose respect for Romney and consider him a waffling and internally-dishonest wind-sniffer to simply get votes, he probably would lose to charismatic Obama who has cunningly convinced Americans that "things are gradually improving but more time is needed for really-positive improvement" - being that Romney would remind such confused voters of defeated compromisers H.W. Bush (who lost to Clinton in '92 when Icorigin voted for Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party, Bob Dole (who also lost to Clinton in '96 when Icorigin again voted for Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party, and McCain/Palin in 2008 (when Icorigin voted for the Prez and VP candidates of the Constitution Party once again).